achieve international sporting success by building specialized facilities雅思寫作運動類7分范文

雅思寫作運動類題目

Some countries achieve international sporting success by building specialized facilities only for the training of top athletes,instead of providing facilities that everyone can use.Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

一些國家為了取得國際體育賽事方面的成功，為頂尖運動員修建了專門的設施，而非提供每個人都能夠使用的場館。你認為這是種積極的發(fā)展還是消極的發(fā)展？

雅思寫作大作文范文

開頭段

Heavy investment in sports facilities aimed at professional athletes is common in countries that want to compete in international events.This is a positive development for national pride but negative on the whole as it takes funding away from the average citizen.

為專業(yè)運動員投入大量資金修建運動設施在一些想要贏得國際比賽的國家中十分常見。這對于國家榮耀而言十分有用，但因為它挪用了普通市民本應享有的資金，因此整體上是消極的。

體育賽事成功的好處

Proponents of this practice would argue that it brings the nation together.The best examples of this relate to international competitions like the summer and winter Olympics.China and the United States have famously invested millions in building sports facilities for prospective Olympians and the results in terms of medals justify the expenditure.The wider implications for national unity come from an entire country watching the telecasts and rooting together.Divisive domestic disputes are temporarily forgotten as everyone focuses on the progress of their country.Much of this would be impossible without specialised sports facilities for the best competitors.

這一做法的支持者認為它能夠?qū)覉F結起來。其最好的案例與諸如夏季和冬季奧運會這樣的國際比賽有關。中國和美國投資百萬為有潛力獲獎的奧林匹克運動員修建運動設施，而獎牌的結果也使得這些花費合理化。整個國家一起觀看電視轉播有助于民族團結?？赡芤鸱至训膬?nèi)部爭論被暫時拋之腦后，因為每個人都在關注他們國家的進步。而如果頂尖運動員沒有專業(yè)運動設施的話，這一點很難實現(xiàn)。

專門場館的壞處

However,these facilities benefit a select few over the majority.Funding for such facilities is a limited part of a federal budget that must cover essential areas like health,education,and the military.Any money diverted towards preparing world-class athletes for international competitions is to some extent a waste as it cuts into the budget for facilities for average people.For example,many inner-city youths in poorer neighbourhoods lack access to parks and such facilities and this has been identified as one of the factors that allows for poverty to be inherited over generations.Direct the funding away from these expensive gyms for top athletes and it would be possible to build many more facilities that serve a much wider and underserved segment of the population.

然而，這些設施只使少部分人獲益，而忽略了大部分人。修建這些設施的資金來自于十分有限的國家預算，而這些預算還需要涵蓋諸如健康、教育和軍事這樣的關鍵領域。任何用于幫助世界級別的運動員備戰(zhàn)國際比賽的資金在某種程度上來說都是浪費，因為它導致服務于普通民眾的資金的減少。例如，許多城市貧困區(qū)域的年輕人無法享受公園一類的設施。而這被認為是貧窮在一代代人之間延續(xù)的因素之一。將資金從頂尖運動員所享有的昂貴體育館上挪走，這樣就能夠建造更多的，服務于更廣泛的貧困人口的設施。

結論

In conclusion,despite the less tangible benefits to national cohesiveness,this is a negative in general as it favours a talented minority.More resources should be allocated towards facilities for those in greater need.

總的來說，盡管在國家凝聚力方面有切實的好處，但這大體而言是消極的，因為它偏向于少部分擁有天賦的群體。更多的資源應該被用于為那些貧困的人修建設施。

>> 雅思 托福 免費課程學習，AI量身規(guī)劃讓英語學習不再困難<<